Fractional CTO for Commercial Scientific R&D

Senior technology leadership for science-led companies.

Dave Cassel joins your leadership team to turn business priorities into a practical technology strategy—covering AI, data and knowledge architecture, software delivery, team capability, and technology investment.

Vendor-neutral guidance. Practical decisions. Stronger execution.

Schedule a Technology Clarity Call

When technology leadership becomes an extra job.

Growing scientific R&D companies often have capable leaders who understand the science, operations, and business—but do not have a senior software or technology leader to guide the decisions that shape growth. That gap can slow progress, raise risk, and leave important opportunities unresolved.

Important technology decisions lack a clear owner.

The company is making consequential choices about software, data, AI, vendors, and infrastructure without the senior technology leadership needed to connect those decisions to business priorities.

Research knowledge is harder to discover than it should be.

Reports, data, and prior work live across systems and security boundaries. Necessary controls can unintentionally hide information that would help researchers avoid repetition and move faster.

AI opportunities are outpacing a practical plan.

Leaders can see potential for AI, but they need a disciplined way to assess where it will create value, what data and processes are required, and how to manage the risks.

If these questions keep surfacing, it may be time for technology leadership support.

  • Which technology priorities will make the greatest difference to the business in the next two quarters?
  • Do we have the right team, skills, and external partners to execute those priorities?
  • Where can AI create meaningful leverage? What needs to be in place before we proceed?
  • Are our data, software, and research systems helping people build on existing knowledge, or creating more friction?

Is a Fractional CTO Right for Your Organization?

A Fractional CTO engagement is designed for companies that need senior technology judgment and leadership-team partnership, but do not yet need a full-time CTO. The right fit is less about a particular technology and more about the decisions the business needs to make next.

A strong fit when…

  • You are a commercial scientific R&D company, typically with $2M–$100M in revenue.
  • Technology leadership has landed with a research, operations, or business executive whose primary expertise is not software engineering.
  • You need a practical technology roadmap tied to business priorities, spending decisions, team capability, and execution risk.
  • You want a senior technology leader to work alongside the executive team, not a detached consultant or a vendor selling a predetermined solution.

Probably not the right model when…

  • You already have a CTO with deep software engineering or computer science leadership experience.
  • Your scale or operating needs clearly require a full-time, in-house technology executive.
  • You are looking only for a standalone software-development vendor rather than leadership support tied to a business strategy.

From uncertain priorities to a workable plan.

01

Assess the technology function.

In the first 30 days, Dave reviews the technology environment, including its strengths and weaknesses, current spending, team composition, and the decisions creating the most risk or friction. He uses the Functional Technology Framework to look at the whole technology function, not simply a list of systems.

02

Build a focused strategic roadmap.

The assessment becomes a one- to two-quarter roadmap. Every proposed initiative is tied to a business goal and includes a recommended priority, relevant skill or capacity gaps, and the investment needed to move forward.

03

Lead execution and strengthen capability.

Dave works with the leadership team and the people responsible for delivery to make decisions, prioritize work, guide technology partners, improve the operating rhythm, and build the capabilities the company needs to execute with confidence.

Dave Cassel

Your Fractional CTO

Dave Cassel

Co-owner & CTO, 4V Services

Dave brings 30 years of software experience to the technology and operating decisions facing growing companies. He has built and led technical teams, worked with research-intensive organizations since 2019, and has been co-owner and CTO of 4V Services since 2018. His role is to bring practical, vendor-neutral technology judgment to the leadership team—so technology better serves the science and the business.

Choose the level of technology leadership you need.

Every engagement is grounded in business priorities and vendor-neutral judgment. The right level of involvement depends on the decisions ahead, the capability already in place, and the pace at which the company needs to move.

Long-Term Growth
Advisory

Focused support for a consequential technology, AI, data, team, or investment decision that requires experienced, independent judgment.

  • Technology investment, build-or-buy, or vendor evaluation
  • AI, data, architecture, or research-system strategy review
  • Independent perspective on team capability, risk, and next steps
Collaborative
Half-Day Workshop

A structured working session that aligns leadership around a specific technology challenge, opportunity, or decision.

  • Executive and technical stakeholder alignment
  • Clear framing of the decision, constraints, and options
  • A practical set of next actions and ownership decisions

Work I've Done in Scientific R&D

The Challenge: A national research laboratory needed to improve how researchers found content across their systems (including SharePoint, Google Drive, and Confluence) while respecting strict security protocols. The core problem was that keyword search couldn't bridge the gap between how scientists ask questions and how documents are written. Researchers were spending too much time searching and not enough time doing research.

What We Built: A unified, concept-based search engine integrated with a custom domain ontology developed in partnership with the lab's scientific staff. Researchers can now find documents based on scientific concepts rather than exact keywords, and the system fully respects each source system's existing access controls.

The Result: Researchers spend less time on administrative searching and more time on the work that matters. Discoverability improved significantly, and the system continues to support the lab's security and compliance requirements.

National Physics Research Laboratory

The Challenge: A global life sciences organization had years of valuable research data spread across legacy systems with complex security requirements. Scientists were spending too much time manually gathering data and not enough time analyzing it.

What We Built: A series of content hub systems with semantic enrichment and custom taxonomy mapping, giving scientists the ability to explore the organization's data by concept rather than by navigating individual systems. We also built analytics to track how researchers were using the systems and whether they were finding what they needed.

The Result: The team shifted from manual data gathering to analysis and decision-making. The engagement has continued for years, built on a foundation of quality work and transparency.

"I had the pleasure of working with 4V Services to process large volumes of unstructured text and extract insights that were critical for our business. Thanks to their expertise, we were able to shift our focus from data gathering to analysis and decision making, ultimately improving our business performance."Innovation Strategist, Fortune 500 Life Sciences Company

Fortune 500 Life Sciences Company

cta-bg

Ready to Chat?

Book your 30-minute Technology Clarity Call. I offer a free, no-obligation consultation to learn about your business and explore whether a Fractional CTO engagement is the right fit.